I'll see a lot of stuff on twitter with some relation to politics, and it's just "oh okay, someone said something dumb, next". Barely even registers to me.
Then I go on KYM and see there's an entire article dedicated to that one particular instance of someone saying something dumb.
I understand that there's no limit to how many articles can be on the site, but seriously, making an article for every single time someone says or does something the slightest bit outrageous, well, it makes people think that the entire world is crazy.
And on every one of these articles, the same exact accounts bust out 5 bajillion paragraphs about why this dumb thing someone said is proof that society is decaying and that things are getting worse (and twitter bad upboats pls). It just feels so fucking pretentious to me.
Then, whenever actual memes are given articles, there's a fifty/fifty chance that KYM will think it's fun, or find some reason to hate it.
So, I'd say the problem is articles laser focusing on every time a political statement gains a smidge of traction, and thus the userbase looking at it and letting it feed into their bias.
For instance, Tucker Carlson's "We Have to Fight to Preserve Our Nation & Heritage" was just something I saw on twitter, among thousands of other political tweets. But it gets an entry with the only impact shown being a handful of tweet responses, and lo and behold, most of the comments take it the complete opposite way of how it was interpreted, and say "Oh it was a benign statement, damn crazy liberals". So I dunno what staff was thinking documenting it, when it just served to further people's biases on here