Forums / Fun! / Memeory Lane

63,527 total conversations in 189 threads


Locked Locked
[Riff-Raff] Cringeworthy General

Last posted May 17, 2014 at 08:55PM EDT. Added Jan 11, 2014 at 10:06AM EST
2679 posts from 208 users

For those of you that don't get the context (aside from the author shipping a balding fat guy with a cartoon dog), the latter character spends the entirety of the episode finding ways to rape the former. And he succeeds on multiple occasions.

Kung Fu Cthulhu wrote:

For those of you that don't get the context (aside from the author shipping a balding fat guy with a cartoon dog), the latter character spends the entirety of the episode finding ways to rape the former. And he succeeds on multiple occasions.

Kung Fu Cthulhu wrote:

For those of you that don't get the context (aside from the author shipping a balding fat guy with a cartoon dog), the latter character spends the entirety of the episode finding ways to rape the former. And he succeeds on multiple occasions.

Maverick The Insane wrote:

its been so long sence i did a animation

"ANIMATION"? WHAT?

It says "animation loops" despite the thing that the "loop" is a fade effect

I dont get the deal with the "Sergals" or whatever they are in the furry fandom…

They're like ¼ Dog, ¼ bird, ¼ raptor and ¼ shark with a bit of cat mixed in. They end up just looking really weird e.g. this:

Spirit Coyote wrote:

I dont get the deal with the "Sergals" or whatever they are in the furry fandom…

They're like ¼ Dog, ¼ bird, ¼ raptor and ¼ shark with a bit of cat mixed in. They end up just looking really weird e.g. this:

Kung Fu Cthulhu wrote:

For those of you that don't get the context (aside from the author shipping a balding fat guy with a cartoon dog), the latter character spends the entirety of the episode finding ways to rape the former. And he succeeds on multiple occasions.

Obligatory "Tonight, you" comment

CrowTheMagician wrote:

Let's see,
1. Low quality picture
2. Poorly shopped text
3. An extremely lame pun
4. An incorrectly wirtten exclamation
5. The stuff advertised is the stuff a normal 9 year old would like. Is this guy trying to get 9 year old kids to chat with him?

Spirit Coyote wrote:

I dont get the deal with the "Sergals" or whatever they are in the furry fandom…

They're like ¼ Dog, ¼ bird, ¼ raptor and ¼ shark with a bit of cat mixed in. They end up just looking really weird e.g. this:

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

Spirit Coyote wrote:

I dont get the deal with the "Sergals" or whatever they are in the furry fandom…

They're like ¼ Dog, ¼ bird, ¼ raptor and ¼ shark with a bit of cat mixed in. They end up just looking really weird e.g. this:

I'm horrified and amused at the same time

Aegisar Boulange wrote:

Directly from the conspiracy-subreddit:

I guess "le anarchists" forgot to factor in what rain does to silly string

(If nobody has used it before, it melts in water)

Ok, I can't remember which gaming website it was (I know it wasn't Gamespot, IGN, or 1up), but the folks, not the viewers, but the EDITORS and such, on there HATED anything Sonic the Hedgehog related…except the first game.

More specifically, they hated every single character whose name wasn't Sonic or Robotnik/Eggman. Sure, I can understand that they're irritated with the large number of characters the games have sometimes, but they even hated Tails, Knuckles, and Amy. Once, when they were tallying up characters people voted on who they wanted to see in a new Super Smash Bros (I believe it was before SSB Wii U/3DS was announced), they listed Knuckles…and said that they were reluctant to list him and only did it so they wouldn't tick off the fans. Another time they expressed a desire to chuck the characters (particularly Amy) into a volcano, and eventually more or less saying: "Why can't they go back to the good old days with 16 bit graphics and it was only Sonic and Eggman/Robotnik?"

I had nostalgia brat tendencies back then, but even I was disgusted enough to cut the website.

Last edited Apr 17, 2014 at 07:54PM EDT
This post has been hidden due to low karma.
Click here to show this post.

TripleA9000 wrote:

Oh no, the Annoying Orange is a fan of something! IT'S SO CRINGY I DON'T CARE IF I HAVE THE OPTION TO NOT WATCH IT AND WHAT THE ANNOYING ORANGE DOES SHOULDN'T BE OF ANY CONCERN TO ME TO THE THREAD!

Paper Jam Dipper wrote:

Oh no, the Annoying Orange is a fan of something! IT'S SO CRINGY I DON'T CARE IF I HAVE THE OPTION TO NOT WATCH IT AND WHAT THE ANNOYING ORANGE DOES SHOULDN'T BE OF ANY CONCERN TO ME TO THE THREAD!

i smell butthurt

Spirit Coyote wrote:

I dont get the deal with the "Sergals" or whatever they are in the furry fandom…

They're like ¼ Dog, ¼ bird, ¼ raptor and ¼ shark with a bit of cat mixed in. They end up just looking really weird e.g. this:

They look like video game enemies that you would find in a poorly made RPG, and people find them sexually attractive?

Lugia41 wrote:

Ok, I can't remember which gaming website it was (I know it wasn't Gamespot, IGN, or 1up), but the folks, not the viewers, but the EDITORS and such, on there HATED anything Sonic the Hedgehog related…except the first game.

More specifically, they hated every single character whose name wasn't Sonic or Robotnik/Eggman. Sure, I can understand that they're irritated with the large number of characters the games have sometimes, but they even hated Tails, Knuckles, and Amy. Once, when they were tallying up characters people voted on who they wanted to see in a new Super Smash Bros (I believe it was before SSB Wii U/3DS was announced), they listed Knuckles…and said that they were reluctant to list him and only did it so they wouldn't tick off the fans. Another time they expressed a desire to chuck the characters (particularly Amy) into a volcano, and eventually more or less saying: "Why can't they go back to the good old days with 16 bit graphics and it was only Sonic and Eggman/Robotnik?"

I had nostalgia brat tendencies back then, but even I was disgusted enough to cut the website.

That looks like a gaming website ran by MarioTehPlumber.

TripleA9000 wrote:

please be a joke, please be joke, please be a joke

To be honest, cloppers (considering myself) are definately not pedophiles, but they're, well,
zoophiles. Check out the Wikipedia link.
Really, this stereotype is the most inaccurate one I've ever known.

Teddy Sadcat wrote:

To be honest, cloppers (considering myself) are definately not pedophiles, but they're, well,
zoophiles. Check out the Wikipedia link.
Really, this stereotype is the most inaccurate one I've ever known.

Unless, of course, the object of your… affections… is a humanized version. But seriously, I hope to God that this guy is joking. I also find it strangely amusing that they all have MLP avatars.

Fuckface wrote:

Im going to be downvoted a lot but…
What im cringing at exactly?

the annoying orange is considered one of the worst things on youtube, (its right up there with the likes of onision, pewdiepie, fred, and thefinebros) the fact that it's trying to embrace my little pony in order to get more views(and more money as a result) is pretty damn cringey. there whoring themselves out to bronies to summarize it

Last edited Apr 18, 2014 at 02:10AM EDT
Skeletor-sm

This thread is closed to new posts.

This thread was locked by an administrator.

Why don't you start a new thread instead?

Namaste! You must login or signup first!