Word Up! You must login or signup first!

25316f94d7c8ce768a94c09b0ef1ddc7

Submission   4,375

Part of a series on Starfield. [View Related Entries]


Overview

Starfield "Invisible Walls" Controversy, not to be confused with the Starfield Menu Controversy, refers to a viral debate and backlash about a supposed discovery that the 2023 Bethesda video game Starfield employed invisible boundaries blocking players from exploring a fully open world. While the veracity of the information is not confirmed and stems from a leak, some players took this as a sign that Bethesda had lied to players about the game being fully open-world and voiced their anger with the perceived sleight.

Background

On August 22nd, 2023, Bethesda head of publishing Pete Hines[1] appeared to confirm that Starfield would allow for infinite player exploration, responding to a fan asking if they could explore an entire planet he said, "Yup, if you want" (shown below).

Jeff Threat (Synthwave Lord) @JeffThreat Aug 21 Ummm @bethesda @DCDeacon @Starfield Game when I land on a planet.. will I be able to explore that whole entire planet? 17 9 8 Pete Hines @DCDeacon Yup, if you want. Walk on, brave explorer. 2:51 AM. Aug 22, 2023 166

On August 26th, the Chinese gaming forum M.gamer.com[2] saw a leak in which a player stated that if they ran for too long in one direction they would receive a pop-up saying, "Boundary reached, open the map to explore another region or return to your ship" (shown below).

FAST TRAVEL DIRECTLY FROM THE MISSIONS MENU. PRESS BOUNDARY REACHED Open the map to explore another region, or return to your ship. FAST TRAVEL TO SHIP OPEN PLANET MAP (X) CANCEL Ⓒ 12

A video showing this phenomenon was uploaded that day but was copy-struck by Bethesda[3] shortly after (repost shown below).

Developments

In late August 2023 as the controversy spread online, the rumored "invisible walls" incensed players who perceived Bethesda as lying to them. For example, on August 29th, 2023, Twitter user @iamalitayyeb[6] expressed disappointment about being "promised" an open-world immersive experience, gaining over 40 retweets and 400 likes in roughly 24 hours (shown below, top). On August 27th, user @WOOLLEY_GAMER[7] expressed similar sentiments about the invisible wall breaking immersion, gaining over 50 retweets and 500 likes in three days (shown below, bottom).

0 HYPED @iamalitayyeb "But Spiderman has invisible walls too" remind me when did Insomniac or Playstation fans hype this game as an infinitely explorable immersive experience? 4:42 AM. Aug 29, 2023 LEAVING AREA You are leaving the playable area RETURN TO GAME

WOOLLEY GAMER: ! #WWCOG & TSGP @WOOLLEY GAMER A 10 minute jog runs you into an invisible wall needing to return to ship. This completely destroys any sense of adventure. No vista can you trave to from where you are seemless. Instead You have to teleport back to your ship, approximate a new destination and hope for the best its close enough, and even if it is, you didn't traverse there... you spawned there via a menu screen, landing cutscene and load screen. and all this time, I was right. Smh I have NO WORDS


Over the following days, the purported leak was denied by some others who said they already had the game. Windows Central editor Jez Corden[4] said the leak was "not entirely accurate" and to wait for the review embargo on the game to lift before jumping to conclusions (shown below, left). Forbes writer Paul Tassi,[5] who also is in possession of a review copy of the game, said nobody "knew what they were talking about."


forbes.com What Does Starfield's Digital Premium Edition Get You Besides An Ear... Here is everything in Starfield's Digital Premium Edition besides Early Access gameplay. Paul Tassi @PaulTassi 17 6 Mikel @Mikel Sarcastic - 17h not true planetary exploration. That's for sure 1 38 Likes 27 57 3 JJ nobody knows what they're talking about J 7:26 AM - Aug 27, 2023-916 Views 22 口 28.5K ₁941 ↑ +] +] ↑

While it's still unclear if Starfield will have "invisible walls" by release, some expressed that they would not mind if there were in fact invisible walls in the game alongside the rumors. Videogamer[8] wrote that Starfield is still a narrative-driven video game, and keeping players on track, writing, "As a role-playing game, each location should really have something to compel the player towards it. Procedurally generated locations simply wouldn’t have this, nor would it have been feasible for each planet to be fully explorable."

Search Interest

Unavailable.

External References



Share Pin

Related Entries 3 total

Starfield_pronoun_freakout
Starfield Pronoun Options Con...
Sfmenucover
Starfield Menu Controversy
1
Starfield Optimization Contro...

Recent Images 6 total


Recent Videos 0 total

There are no recent videos.




Load 25 Comments
Starfield invisible walls controversy depicting a screenshot from the video game.

Starfield "Invisible Walls" Controversy

Part of a series on Starfield. [View Related Entries]

Updated Aug 30, 2023 at 03:51PM EDT by Zach.

Added Aug 30, 2023 at 12:15PM EDT by Adam.

PROTIP: Press 'i' to view the image gallery, 'v' to view the video gallery, or 'r' to view a random entry.

This submission is currently being researched & evaluated!

You can help confirm this entry by contributing facts, media, and other evidence of notability and mutation.

Overview

Starfield "Invisible Walls" Controversy, not to be confused with the Starfield Menu Controversy, refers to a viral debate and backlash about a supposed discovery that the 2023 Bethesda video game Starfield employed invisible boundaries blocking players from exploring a fully open world. While the veracity of the information is not confirmed and stems from a leak, some players took this as a sign that Bethesda had lied to players about the game being fully open-world and voiced their anger with the perceived sleight.

Background

On August 22nd, 2023, Bethesda head of publishing Pete Hines[1] appeared to confirm that Starfield would allow for infinite player exploration, responding to a fan asking if they could explore an entire planet he said, "Yup, if you want" (shown below).


Jeff Threat (Synthwave Lord) @JeffThreat Aug 21 Ummm @bethesda @DCDeacon @Starfield Game when I land on a planet.. will I be able to explore that whole entire planet? 17 9 8 Pete Hines @DCDeacon Yup, if you want. Walk on, brave explorer. 2:51 AM. Aug 22, 2023 166

On August 26th, the Chinese gaming forum M.gamer.com[2] saw a leak in which a player stated that if they ran for too long in one direction they would receive a pop-up saying, "Boundary reached, open the map to explore another region or return to your ship" (shown below).


FAST TRAVEL DIRECTLY FROM THE MISSIONS MENU. PRESS BOUNDARY REACHED Open the map to explore another region, or return to your ship. FAST TRAVEL TO SHIP OPEN PLANET MAP (X) CANCEL Ⓒ 12

A video showing this phenomenon was uploaded that day but was copy-struck by Bethesda[3] shortly after (repost shown below).


Developments

In late August 2023 as the controversy spread online, the rumored "invisible walls" incensed players who perceived Bethesda as lying to them. For example, on August 29th, 2023, Twitter user @iamalitayyeb[6] expressed disappointment about being "promised" an open-world immersive experience, gaining over 40 retweets and 400 likes in roughly 24 hours (shown below, top). On August 27th, user @WOOLLEY_GAMER[7] expressed similar sentiments about the invisible wall breaking immersion, gaining over 50 retweets and 500 likes in three days (shown below, bottom).


0 HYPED @iamalitayyeb "But Spiderman has invisible walls too" remind me when did Insomniac or Playstation fans hype this game as an infinitely explorable immersive experience? 4:42 AM. Aug 29, 2023 LEAVING AREA You are leaving the playable area RETURN TO GAME

WOOLLEY GAMER: ! #WWCOG & TSGP @WOOLLEY GAMER A 10 minute jog runs you into an invisible wall needing to return to ship. This completely destroys any sense of adventure. No vista can you trave to from where you are seemless. Instead You have to teleport back to your ship, approximate a new destination and hope for the best its close enough, and even if it is, you didn't traverse there... you spawned there via a menu screen, landing cutscene and load screen. and all this time, I was right. Smh I have NO WORDS


Over the following days, the purported leak was denied by some others who said they already had the game. Windows Central editor Jez Corden[4] said the leak was "not entirely accurate" and to wait for the review embargo on the game to lift before jumping to conclusions (shown below, left). Forbes writer Paul Tassi,[5] who also is in possession of a review copy of the game, said nobody "knew what they were talking about."


forbes.com What Does Starfield's Digital Premium Edition Get You Besides An Ear... Here is everything in Starfield's Digital Premium Edition besides Early Access gameplay. Paul Tassi @PaulTassi 17 6 Mikel @Mikel Sarcastic - 17h not true planetary exploration. That's for sure 1 38 Likes 27 57 3 JJ nobody knows what they're talking about J 7:26 AM - Aug 27, 2023-916 Views 22 口 28.5K ₁941 ↑ +] +] ↑

While it's still unclear if Starfield will have "invisible walls" by release, some expressed that they would not mind if there were in fact invisible walls in the game alongside the rumors. Videogamer[8] wrote that Starfield is still a narrative-driven video game, and keeping players on track, writing, "As a role-playing game, each location should really have something to compel the player towards it. Procedurally generated locations simply wouldn’t have this, nor would it have been feasible for each planet to be fully explorable."

Search Interest

Unavailable.

External References

Recent Videos

There are no videos currently available.

Recent Images 6 total


Top Comments

Panuru
Panuru

I want to be sure that I understand this. We have one anonymous Chinese forum poster saying there are invisible walls. We have (at least) two named, established game reviewers with confirmed advance copies saying that's not the case. But they can't be more specific because they're under NDA until closer to release.

Is that correct?

+29

+ Add a Comment

Comments (25)


Display Comments

Add a Comment