Am I seriously supposed to believe what he’s saying is wrong?
How much cognitive dissonance does one have to have to write something that speaks truth and label it as “crazy ebil nadsi lies”?

Can we agree that Hydra is not a good solution to the European immigrant crisis? Hydra does not believe in power to the common man, nor in the preservation of culture. What he's showing is how you get good people behind evil movements. Yes he may be speaking truth now, but that's coincidental. He'd say the same thing if it were a lie.

Imagine growing up in Germany in the 1930's for a moment. The treaty of Versailles was total shit and everyone knew it. It would be very easy to gather a crowd with rhetoric toward the effect that Germany didn't deserve its current situation. Someone could make a very agreeable case that something needs to be done to alleviate the economic hardships and so forth, and doing so wouldn't be evil. How you do evil is, once you have an impassioned audience, you make aggressive claims that they wouldn't otherwise agree to and rely on the nationalism to keep you going. Once you have a crowd, then and only then you start blaming ethnicity minorities who had nothing to do with it. Before anyone realizes what they've agreed to you have the Nazi party.
The same thing can happen in America if you're not careful. (1/2)