Wow. Where to begin.
>"We are entitled to a good game"
From what has been seen so far, is it NOT already? Among all the freakin crap they've crammed in, is it the few things they ask for keeping it from considering it "good"? These are not fair criticisms of the game, you're just nitpicking at this point.
>mocking people who say they worked hard
Are you saying that's NOT a valid excuse? Do you really watch all the videos and think, "Eh, they're not trying"? What is wrong with you? What is your standards, because they are getting ridiculous.
>a non-consumer defending Daddy Sakurai
… Well that's just stupid. Moving on.
>"children starving in Africa"
Don't act like you're taking the high road here. You could be focusing on them too instead of nitpicking Smash. Just as guilty, so don't try.
>screeching
No. They're calling you out. People went berserk with the Waluigi snub, but we're wrong for trying to cut that stupidity out? I don't think so. Just accept that it's not the super-ultra-perfect game because it's missing a few things (and you know damn well if they WERE included, people would still find something else to ask for) and move on to other matters… like those starving children you mentioned.
TL;DR
SCREEEEEECH, apparently.

Maybe if the "criticism" ever amounted to more than just, "I'm mad that they didn't include X character."