-
Has Elon Musk Been Caught Posting On 4chan? Analyzing The Viral Rumor Surrounding 'Adrian Dittmann' Theories -
What Is The 'Chopped Chin' Meme? Instagram Reels' Viral 'Running Into You In My Head' Memes Explained -
Futurologist Who Predicted We'd Be 'Having Sex With Robots By 2025' Says The Possibility Is Still Out There -
What Is The 'McDonald’s x Evangelion' Collaboration? The 'Neon Genesis Evangelion' Collab And Its Memes Explained -
What's Up With Freaky Rin Itoshi From 'Blue Lock'? The Anime Meme Confusing Everyone Else Explained
-18
Mommy was a judge!
Uploaded by BrentD15 Sep 27, 2018 at 06:21PM EDT
brett kavanaugh supreme court sexual assault nepotism
Origin Entry: Brett Kavanaugh Supreme Court Nomination
File type: jpg
Resolution: (800px x 515px)
File size: 65.6 KB
Moar:
From the yearbook: "Beach Week Ralph Club - Biggest Contributor." But he never drank to excess or illegally? Not sure how this is at all meant to be exculpatory or back up rather than contradict the choir boy claim.
Share Pin
this page from Kavanaugh's calendar looks like the cover to a seven-inch by some Pavement wannabe band called Beach Week
Share Pin
-18
Brett Kavanaugh Supreme Court Nomination - Mommy was a judge!
| ◄ Previous | View Gallery Random Image | Next ► |
![it was reportedly Senate Democratic staff who conveyed the allegations to the media rather than alert Republican staff to conduct a bipartisan investigation. Finally, you ask that the FBI investigate Ms. Ramirez's claims. As you know, Judge Kavanaugh has gone through six FBI background investigations over the past 25 years. The FBI's investigations covered his time at Yale and uncovered nothing remotely similar to the misconduct alleged by Ms. Ramirez. Additionally, as the New Yorker story itself states, the publication could "not confirm] with other eyewitnesses that Kavanaugh was present at the party." And the New York Times spoke to several dozen people to corroborate Ms. Ramirez's allegations but "could find no one with firsthand knowledge." Indeed, the Times reports that Ms. Ramirez herself said she could not be sure Judge Kavanaugh did what she alleged in the New Yorker article. It's not clear how the FBI could further illuminate what transpired at a dormitory party 35 years ago. Even the liberal New York Times did not find these allegations "fit to print.'" As of now, the only allegations of which the Committee is aware with respect to Ms. Ramirez are the allegations described in the New Yorker. As you know, false statements made to the press are not subject to criminal penalty, but false statements to Congress are. If Ms. Ramirez submit:s testimony and evidence to the Senate Judiciary Committee, which Committee investigators have requested, we can decide how to proceed. But, at this time, Democratic staff has not shared any such evidence it has with Republican staff. And, because Ms. Ramirez's allegations are unrelated to Dr. Ford's, there is no reason at all to delay the hearing on Thursday in light of these new allegations. Sincerely, Chuck Grassley Chairman](https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/list/001/414/568/b3b.jpg "Grassley letter to Feinstein (part 2)")
Comments (0)
Add a Comment
Image Details
339 views (4 from today)
Uploaded Sep 27, 2018 at 06:21PM EDT
Origin Entry
About the Uploader
BrentD15
Treasurer & Elocutionist & Media Maid
There are no comments currently available.
Display Comments