Guts Cosplayer With An Impossibly Huge Sword On His Shoulder Inspires Redraws
+82
Brett Kavanaugh Supreme Court Nomination - F for the harmless bois that got caught in the crossfire
| ◄ Previous | View Gallery Random Image | Next ► |
-
-
What's Up With Memes About A 'Leopards Eating People's Faces' Political Party? Memes About Face-Eating Leopards Explained -
What Is 'OCDA,' AKA 'Occupational Cares Diversity Affairs'? TikToker Calimar White's Boss-Hating Complaints Company Explained -
What's A 'Cleveland Steamer'? The Gross Slang Term Popularized By 'Family Guy' Explained -
What's The 'You Digging In Me' Meme? The TikTok Sound From A LoveAndLightTv Video Explained
![it was reportedly Senate Democratic staff who conveyed the allegations to the media rather than alert Republican staff to conduct a bipartisan investigation. Finally, you ask that the FBI investigate Ms. Ramirez's claims. As you know, Judge Kavanaugh has gone through six FBI background investigations over the past 25 years. The FBI's investigations covered his time at Yale and uncovered nothing remotely similar to the misconduct alleged by Ms. Ramirez. Additionally, as the New Yorker story itself states, the publication could "not confirm] with other eyewitnesses that Kavanaugh was present at the party." And the New York Times spoke to several dozen people to corroborate Ms. Ramirez's allegations but "could find no one with firsthand knowledge." Indeed, the Times reports that Ms. Ramirez herself said she could not be sure Judge Kavanaugh did what she alleged in the New Yorker article. It's not clear how the FBI could further illuminate what transpired at a dormitory party 35 years ago. Even the liberal New York Times did not find these allegations "fit to print.'" As of now, the only allegations of which the Committee is aware with respect to Ms. Ramirez are the allegations described in the New Yorker. As you know, false statements made to the press are not subject to criminal penalty, but false statements to Congress are. If Ms. Ramirez submit:s testimony and evidence to the Senate Judiciary Committee, which Committee investigators have requested, we can decide how to proceed. But, at this time, Democratic staff has not shared any such evidence it has with Republican staff. And, because Ms. Ramirez's allegations are unrelated to Dr. Ford's, there is no reason at all to delay the hearing on Thursday in light of these new allegations. Sincerely, Chuck Grassley Chairman](https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/list/001/414/568/b3b.jpg "Grassley letter to Feinstein (part 2)")
Top Comments
Pearl: crystal gem
Oct 07, 2018 at 02:53PM EDT in reply to
HumbleWaterFilterMerchant
Oct 07, 2018 at 06:55AM EDT