As long as it can be justified in-universe I can go with it. Really, any justification will work as long as it doesn’t conflict with anything else we know from the show.
We may have something!
So by this, if someone can show why Twilight survived multiple objects falling from the sky but was afraid to fall into swamp water (apparently for fear of her life and not getting dirty like Rarity,) then that would make those moments more tolerable.
Being a fan of both, I can't imagine there to be as many plotholes (I said plotholes…) in Zelda. Each game's story has been worked on for years, but the plot and scenes would probably only last as long as a 2-hour movie. Writers for FiM probably only have a few weeks to come up with an episode, and to be honest, they probably aren't putting a lot of effort into consistencies for a show targeted at young girls, because most of them won't care. (Simply, Zelda and FiM are different.)
But there are a lot of things we'd have to explain off. And since Nintendork notices these things, he could probably point out a ton of things that just can't be explained in-universe.
I'll try to explain certain points, if you'd like, but I don't know if I'll be able to do it for everything. We generally dismiss everything like that with a "It's magic. I ain't gotta explain shit." macro or that Mr. Bean video.
And doggone-it, I will will frown with the intensity of a thousand suns if someone posts that Mr. Bean link…
@Daniel and dac
Oh, it doesn't bother me. I just overlook it. I think the thing is that the physics aren't consistent, and that's what bothers Nintendork.
Piano falls on head=Twilight fine.
Twilight falls into water-Twilight afraid of death.
So there has to be a decent explanation for it. For ^ that situation above, there really isn't. And stuff like that bothers Nintendork.