Black Graphic T wrote:
>You clearly have no idea what solitary confinement is if you're comparing a quarantine to it. Things you can't do in a solitary confinement is leave your house to go grocery shopping, leave for exercise, have a phone, have a computer, have a kitchen, have a living room. Solitary is being locked in your bathroom, sometimes without even being allowed lights, and often without contact with guards even.
That's not what's happening here, so don't compare the two and suck it up, buttercup.
First, rude.
Second my analogy illustrates the problem by pointing out the extreme, its still a problem even with mitigation. Confinement and isolation wears on most people and communication technology is not a 1:1 substitutes for the average person, not for the long haul and certainly not for the myriad variations of "does not thrive in confinement" humanity has.
People will get more and more unruly the longer it goes, tell them to suck it up all you want eventually those that reply with a "fuck you" will exceed what the western governments will are willing or even able to suppress.
Ryumaru Borike wrote:
>And again, and for the last time the problems of undoing the quarantine early is every problem of the quarantine itself magnified, not the other way around. 8 million people die in a month, all stores will be shut down and people will not go anywhere on their own, and the economy will crash, but since people are now dead, it'll be harder to recover, especially if the virus mutates in such an environment. You are severely underestimating the amount of damage millions of Americans dying to a disease more infectious than the Flu would do if you think quarantine can even approach it.
I get using extremes for emphasis but 8 Million in a month would require the entire 350 million to get it all at once, its not that fast even were it to see an uncontrolled end of quarentine.
In psychopathic economic terms: no it wouldnt be more damaging than a depression. Its a resperatory disease with symptoms that only last a week and whose symptoms vary in intensity depending on the health of the infected, those it kills are the elderly and the invalid; typically of little to no economic productivity. For the overwhelming majority of the working age population it would indeed be no worse than the flu.
Businesses would not shut down nor travel end, the economy itself would see disruption but not destruction. What would see destruction would be having 2/3rds of the economy shut down for months on end and being forced to canibalize themselves or go out of business.
You know whats bad for maintaining the quarentine? Governments losing the tax revenue while also now having to support those unemployed. You know whats worse for maintaining it? 10-20% of the working age population sitting at home dwelling on thier now insecure future while considering the fact that most of them would still have a job if the government had done pretty much anything else than a full quarentine.