@A Real Libertarian ~
In all honestly, perhaps we should just let KYM "die".
*Not the site itself, but the way us GGers frequent it.
From the offset, the mods and many aGGros/Neutrals have been upset that GG keeps trending on the site. They've shown disdain at the fact that we use the comments section as a "hub" for talking about all things even remotely related to GG, SJWs, the gaming industry and nerd culture.
On one hand, I think there's nothing wrong with us talking about that stuff in the comments section (so long as we keep it there and do not try to spam the actual galleries). As it keeps us happy, because we get to talk about/share recent news/events and it helps KYM stay relevant (even if only, just a little).
On the other hand, Gamergate isn't really a "Meme".. it's a living thing, that keeps on evolving and KYM (along with its mods and typical user base) isn't really accommodating to that sort of thing.
IE: Most KYM articles seem to have an "origin story" with only a few updates over the years, where most people come to post their "reactions" in the comments section, then leave that meme to look for something else to "react" to.
When thinking about it that way, in some sense, KYM isn't really "worth" our time.
IE: We could be talking about this stuff on "KotakuInAction" which is much more accommodating to "constant updates/news flow".
We've even got TopHat2 (the mod that wanted to restrict GG to "ethics only") stepping down.
#FoodForThought.
~
@Slutty Sam.
As someone thats been here since the beginning and recently took a few days off from KYM to catch up on some work, only to come back to the comments section being locked because TehDoh decided to troll KYM.
I can honestly say that if anyone is "taking things a bit too seriously".. it's the mods that over reacted by locking things up and continuing to downplay GG in this very thread.
It's the same dismissive attitude we've been presented with since the beginning, including when we asked for updates to our article a few months ago and the mods not only ignored us, they turned around and acted like we were the bad guys.
IE: Stating that we were "attacking" them, for no reason.
Which is funny, when you think about it.
1. When we first noticed that the article wasn't being updated, a few people offered to become an editor to ensure it stayed up todate, where-in Ms Fortune actually got accepted.
2. We presented this little fact to the mods (that were "offended" and trying to preach to us about KYM rules and regulations in the comments section), showing that they were infact "informed" at the very least, that the article wasn't up to par.
At which point, they pretended her getting "approved" for editorship didn't mean she or anyone else notified the mods (over the last 3 months) that the article should be updated.
IE: They performed mental gymnastics, to maintain their "narrative" that no one let them know the article needed to be updated, even downplaying the new editor they just "hired" a few weeks prior.
3. For Gamergate to continue trending, that would mean that the comments section is always being updated with new posts. Thus with new "happenings".
That fact alone, implies that they should "pop in" occasionally to ask for summaries/links/references to be CONSIDERED, to be added to the article.
Yet they didn't, they waited until they thought they had a reason to "preach" to us, before committing any time to the comments section.
Compare that attitude to what's happening now and in this very thread.
Q!: Are the mods bad guys or corrupt?
A!: No, they just don't give a shit and will ignore things until they're "forced" (in their mind) to respond.
As for "The Libertarian" and his/her remarks, it looks like he/she just cares about this site more than most do and is worried that it will be "punished" by the fickle nature of the internet, due to the mods recent "knee jerk/dismissive" reaction.
Often times, people that care too much about something, will look like concern trolls.
#FoodForThough2