@Rapscallion
OK, I meant like back in November when I uploaded an image it was removed with a message "If you’re going to upload something to the Gamergate gallery, please make sure it actually has something to do with Gamergate. Not everything Zoe Quinn et al do falls in that category"
So I re-uploaded it with an explanation (it shows game journalist Leigh Alexander, Zoe Quinn, and Brianna Wu all whom were big names in AntiGamer being friends months before they allegedly met while "being targeted for harassment by GamerGate").
Then I got suspended with a message "Alright, so after having an image deleted for irrelevance and then getting a direct warning about it, you immediately re-uploaded it. Very smart. How about a break".
So I used the ban appeal process or whatever it was that pops up when someone is suspended, I never got a response, it wasn't until I think months later that I found out mods don't see that.
I had no clue how I'm supposed to explain the relevance.
So I continue on, another image I uploaded got removed so I just left it, until I uploaded an image of one the biggest names in AntiGamer telling a prominent person in GamerGate that their SWATing was no big deal and I got suspended for that.
Around the same time I noticed a bunch of people being suspended or even outright banned for the same thing.
I said back then
It would be a lot easier if “irrelevant” was defined in an easy to see place.
Because right now it seems like it seems the definition is “a mod doesn’t like it”.
You can’t expect people to change their behavior if you don’t clearly explain what they did wrong.
Because right now it seems like the only options are “get suspended repeatedly, then banned” or “never upload anything”.
Just calling an image “vague” is too vague to be useful in identifying the problem.
After that Twenty-One (still like the guy for this) came out with the "OK, we kind of made some mistakes, let's work together and fix them" announcement and I thought everything would work out.
Instead here we are.
That's the problem I'm trying to solve by asking "but what does 'relevant' mean"?
@Loli
Thank you.