Twitter Files 2022 controversy.

Twitter Files

Part of a series on New York Post's Hunter Biden Hard Drive Leak. [View Related Entries]

Updated Dec 12, 2022 at 07:47PM EST by Philipp.

Added Dec 07, 2022 at 09:32AM EST by Philipp.

PROTIP: Press 'i' to view the image gallery, 'v' to view the video gallery, or 'r' to view a random entry.

This submission is currently being researched & evaluated!

You can help confirm this entry by contributing facts, media, and other evidence of notability and mutation.

Overview

The Twitter Files refers to a series of internal emails shedding light on Twitter's alleged suppression of the 2020 Hunter Biden Hard Drive Leak story, which was released by journalist Matt Taibbi in early December 2022. The documents revealed the process of how the suppression was purportedly installed and pointed at possible drivers behind the decision, including many of Twitter's staff, with the following installments of the Twitter Files shedding light on visibility filtering on Twitter and on the decisionmaking process behind the "Donald Trump's ":https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/people/donald-trump suspension following the January 6th, 2021, Capitol attack. The leak prompted viral discussions of freedom of speech on social media and widespread controversy.

Background

New York Post's Hunter Biden Hard Drive Leak

On October 14th, 2020, the New York Post[1] published an article titled, "Smoking-gun email reveals how Hunter Biden introduced Ukrainian businessman to VP dad," in which emails allegedly sent between Joe Biden's son Hunter and a Ukrainian businessman were released. The article also included several photographs of Hunter Biden allegedly sourced from the hard drive, including pictures of him shirtless, smoking cigarettes and sleeping with a glass pipe hanging from his mouth.


From: Vadym Pozharskyi <v.pozharskyi.ukraine@gmail.com> Subject: Meeting for coffee? Date: April 17, 2015 at 6:00:51 AM PDT To: Hunter Biden <hbiden@rosemontseneca.com> Dear Hunter, thank you for inviting me to DC and giving an opportunity to meet your father and spent some time together. It's realty an honor and pleasure. As we spoke yesterday evening, would be great to meet today for a quick coffee. What do you think? I could come to you office somewhere around noon or so, before or on my way to airport. Best , V Отправлено с iPhone

That day, journalist Yashar Ali tweeted that Twitter was blocking users from posting a link to the NY Post story in both tweets and direct messages, purportedly suppressing the spread of the story. White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany had notably been locked out of her account for posting a tweet about it.[2] Later that day, the official @TwitterSafety feed published a series of tweets explaining the company's reasoning for censoring the NY Post story, claiming it violated a policy that "prohibits the use of our service to distribute content obtained without authorization."

The Twitter Files

Two years later, on December 2nd, 2022 (notably after Elon Musk's acquisition of Twitter), journalist Matt Taibbi released screenshots of internal communications between high-ranking Twitter management on October 14th, 2020, which purportedly shed light on decision-making at the company that day. The documents, obtained by sources at Twitter and provided to journalists Matt Taibbi and Bari Weiss, contained emails in which Twitter management discussed measures taken by the company that day and the reasoning behind them.

The release, made in a 37-tweet-long thread,[3] started with Matt Taibbi discussing Twitter deleting tweets allegedly at the behest of political parties, and, due to "Twitter [being] overwhelmingly staffed by people of one political orientation," there were more ways to complain openly to the Democrats than to the Republicans, resulting in a "slant in content moderation decisions."


Matt Taibbi @mtaibbi Dec 2 9. Celebrities and unknowns alike could be removed or reviewed at the behest of a political party: Oct 25, 2020 at 9:58 AM the first one under SI... defer to Safety on the high profile second or Oct 24, 2020 at 6:54 PM onal report from DNC. witter.com/stephen_liuhuan/status/1320153232006676484 witter.com/RealJamesWoods/status/1320171179504644098 :le 3,716 22 Matt Taibbi @mtaibbi Dec 2 10. Both parties had access to these tools. For instance, in 2020, requests from both the Trump White House and the Biden campaign were received and honored. However: 3,163 18 24.9K $185.267 20 $968.749 Matt Taibbi @mtaibbi Dec 2 11. This system wasn't balanced. It was based on contacts. Because Twitter was and is overwhelmingly staffed by people of one political orientation, there were more channels, more ways to complain, open to the left (well, Democrats) than the right. opensecrets.org/orgs/twitter/s... ntributions by Party of Recipient O Total Democrats 0 14.9K $309.394 $165.969 $909.431 % to Dems 99.73% 111.7K 98.47% $295.722 96.38% Otwitter.com> wrot 84.7K twitter.com Republicans $451 $14.137 $11,100 % to Repubs 0.27% 1.53% 3.62%

Further in the thread, Taibbi summarized the measures purportedly implemented by Twitter to suppress the spread of the New Your Post story, which was marked as violating Twitter's "Hacked Materials" policy, and published several emails sent by high-ranking officials on October 14th, 2020. In one of the leaked emails, communications official Trenton Kennedy writes,[4] “I'm struggling to understand the policy basis for marking this as unsafe” (shown below, left). In another email,[5] former Trust and safety chief Yoel Roth cited "lessons of 2016" as one of the reasons for suppressing the spread of the story (shown below, right).


2020-10-14 NYPost Hunter Biden Laptop Article - PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL our teams continue to investigate the origins of the material included in the reporting. Trenton Kennedy I'm struggling to understand the policy basis for marking this as unsafe, and I think the best explainability argument for this externally would be that we're waiting to understand if this story is the result of hacked materials. We'll face hard questions on this if we don't have some kind of solid reasoning for marking the link unsafe. Trenton Kennedy cc: @yoel@twitter.com @rsommers@twitter.com @iplunkett@twitter.com @krosborough@twitter.com Katie Rosborough Will we also mark similar stories as unsafe? https://www.foxnews.com/politics/hunter-biden-emails-senate-homeland-security-committee-investigating-hard- drive-laptop Yoel Roth mmmmmmmm The policy basis is hacked materials - though, as discussed, this is an emerging situation where the facts remain unclear. Given the SEVERE risks here and lessons of 2016, we're erring on the side of including a warning and preventing this content from being amplified. Vijaya Gadde mmmmmmmmmm What is the warning that will come up? Yoel Roth mmmmmmmm New When you click the link, you'll see the generic unsafe URL message (references spam, malware, and violations of the Twitter Rules) - not ideal, but it's the only thing we have lan Plunkett New Whatever we do in the comms (this will become a bias claim for Jack pre-hearing immediately), let's make it clear we're proactively but cautiously interpreting this through the lens of our hacked materials policy and allowing the link with a warning and significant reduction of spread.

More emails leaked by @mtabbi revealed a conversation between Twitter and the research firm NetChoice, in which NetChoice quoted Congress officials saying "tech is screwed and rightfully so" and reported that the Democratic party wanted social media to have more moderation.[6][7]

The first tweet in the thread received over 130,000 retweets and 376,000 views in five days, and the Twitter Files were widely covered by mass media in the following days.

Developments

Twitter Deputy General Counsel Jim Baker Fired

On December 6th, 2022, Twitter Deputy General Counsel Jim Baker was fired[8] by Twitter CEO Elon Musk for his role in the suppression of the Hunter Biden laptop story — with some notably purporting that Musk was unaware of Baker's role in his company prior to his dismissal.[16] It was later revealed that Baker, a former FBI attorney, was involved in reviewing the Twitter files before they were sent to Taibbi and Weiss.

Twitter Files Supplemental

On December 6th, 2022, Matt Taibbi posted another Twitter Files thread in which he reported the firing of Jim Baker and disclosed that Baker was the person in charge of releasing the Twitter Files (shown below).[9]


Matt Taibbi @mtaibbi THREAD: Twitter Files Supplemental 4:38 PM Dec 6, 2022 21.9K Retweets 3,178 Quote Tweets 365 Matt Taibbi Replying to @mtaibbi On Friday, the first installment of the Twitter files was published here. We expected to publish more over the weekend. Many wondered why there was a delay. 1,884 27 526 @mtaibbi 18h 892 79.6K Likes 4,450 Matt Taibbi @mtaibbi 18h We can now tell you part of the reason why. On Tuesday, Twitter Deputy General Counsel (and former FBI General Counsel) Jim Baker was fired. Among the reasons? Vetting the first batch of "Twitter Files" - without knowledge of new management. 12.6K 539 Matt Taibbi @mtaibbi 18h The process for producing the "Twitter Files" involved delivery to two journalists (Bari Weiss and me) via a lawyer close to new management. However, after the initial batch, things became complicated. t 4,669 28K Matt Taibbi @mtaibbi 18h "My jaw hit the floor," says Weiss. t 4,208 48.2K Matt Taibbi @mtaibbi - 18h Over the weekend, while we both dealt with obstacles to new searches, it was @BariWeiss who discovered that the person in charge of releasing the files was someone named Jim. When she called to ask "Jim's" last name, the answer came back: "Jim Baker." 7,435 3 30.5K ↑ 36.8K 32K ←

In the thread, Taibbi wrote that the next installment of The Twitter Files would be published on Twitter by journalist Bari Weiss.[10]

The same day, investigative journalist Lee Fang highlighted[15] that James Baker was allegedly involved in assisting the Hillary Clinton presidential campaign's operatives in spreading fabricated evidence against her competitor Donald Trump (tweet shown below).


Lee Fang @lhfang Twitter's former top attorney James Baker was formerly an FBI attorney who passed on fake dirt from the Hillary campaign's operatives in 2016, alleging a secret online portal from Russia's Alfa Bank to Trump. Now attempted to shape the “Twitter Files." Matt Taibbi @mtaibbi 19h The news that Baker was reviewing the “Twitter files" surprised everyone involved, to say the least. New Twitter chief Elon Musk acted quickly to "exit" Baker Tuesday. Show this thread : 4:56 PM Dec 6, 2022

Twitter Files Parts 2-5

On December 8th, Bari Weiss released[17] the second part of the Twitter Files, dedicated to "Twitter's secret blacklists."

A new #TwitterFiles investigation reveals that teams of Twitter employees build blacklists, prevent disfavored tweets from trending, and actively limit the visibility of entire accounts or even trending topics--all in secret, without informing users.

On December 9th, 10th and 12th, journalists Matt Taibbi, Michael Shellenberger and Bari Weiss released parts three,[18] four[19] and five[20] of Twitter Files on Twitter, all revealing internal communications during the January 6th, 2021, Storming of the United States Capitol and in the days that followed, the events which ultimately resulted in Twitter suspending president Donald J. Trump on January 8th. The documents revealed that Twitter employees organized[21] to demand their employer ban Trump, with Twitter executives banning Trump despite key staffers not being able to confirm that Trump did incite violence.[21]


Matt Taibbi @mtaibbi 1. THREAD: The Twitter Files THE REMOVAL OF DONALD TRUMP Part One: October 2020-January 6th 6:04 PM Dec 9, 2022 Michael Shellenberger @Shellenberger MD 1. TWITTER FILES, PART 4 The Removal of Donald Trump: January 7 As the pressure builds, Twitter executives build the case for a permanent ban 6:28 PM Dec 10, 2022

Online Reactions

The Twitter Files became a major topic in early December 2022 as it was widely covered in the media, with The New York Times,[11] The Washington Post[12] and other news outlets reporting on the story.

On social media, the release of the Twitter Files was followed by viral debates, with users expressing various opinions on the matter and demanding accountability from those involved (example tweets shown below).


-1-2018) opposite Lex Fridman @lexfridman Twitter Files saga continues to reveal abuses of power. It's unfortunate to see. But, again, transparency is good for everyone in the long run. 9:24 PM Dec 6, 2022

On December 4th, YouTuber[13] Asmongold also uploaded a video about the Twitter Files, which received over 363,000 views on YouTube in four days (shown below).



On December 7th, 2022, following the news of James Baker's involvement in reviewing the Twitter Files, Twitter co-founder and former CEO Jack Dorsey urged[14] Elon Musk to "release everything without filter." The tweet (shown below) received over 2,100 retweets and 14,300 likes in one day.


Elon Musk @elonmusk. Dec 2 Tune in for Episode 2 of The Twitter Files tomorrow! 71.5K 37.4K Elon Musk @elonmusk Dec 3 Looks like we will need another day or so 1 9,588 6,795 jack @jack 630.8K 7:36 AM Dec 7, 2022 129.8K 소 Replying to @elonmusk If the goal is transparency to build trust, why not just release everything without filter and let people judge for themselves? Including all discussions around current and future actions? Make everything public now. #TwitterFiles

Search Interest

External References

Recent Videos 3 total

Recent Images 46 total


Top Comments

Marlotix
Marlotix

The big takeaways from this:
· Twitter would suppress information and tweets at the requests of different political parties, specifically the Trump Administration, the Biden Campaign, and several Democrat officials. Despite requests coming from both Republicans and Democrats, the suppressions put in place were most often left-wing in bias.
· Twitter suppressed the Hunter Biden laptop story in 2020, but this was not because of any government involvement. It was a personal choice by the Twitter staff (but without Jack Dorsey's knowledge), believed to be to protect Joe Biden's reputation just 3 weeks before the election.
· Supposedly the only things the Biden Campaign requested be removed were nudes of Hunter Biden (which were already against Twitter policy) from the laptop leak. They didn't request any suppression of the story itself.
· Some Democrat officials became aware Twitter was suppressing the Hunter story and were openly for it. They later pushed for more moderation. "The First Amendment isn't absolute", one said.
· Elon calls Twitter's suppression by the government "A violation of the First Amendment". Unfortunately this is not a violation of the First Amendment, as the government only requested Twitter take the tweets down, not forced. And even if they did force Twitter to, it wouldn't be a violation in the case of the Biden Campaign, as no one in that campaign, including Biden himself, held any political office at the time of the requests.

+47

+ Add a Comment

Comments (122)


Display Comments

Add a Comment


Yo! You must login or signup first!