GamerGate - Math Bias

His methodology is flawed for a myriad of reasons. (As is the rebuttal image, but at least the rebuttal attempts to use actual math to prove it's point)

>Presents a false dichtomy

He assumes that you can only be pro or anti; there is no neutral, anti-both, or people who support either side in degress that are not "complete support"

>Assumes that every view on Youtube is different from every KiA subscriber and 8chan poster

>Ignores that GG "membership" has changed over time

I myself went from pro to neutral; I only come to this gallery occasionally because I like drama

>Present numbers based on unjustified conjecture

>It's impossible to asses GG membership correctly

Before assessing how many members GG has, you need to define what GG is. Problem is that the definition of GG changes from person to person (even if you find common ground on Journalistic Ethics, everyone will tell you something different)

TL;DR studying GG by watchin Youtube videos and reading news articules is futile

Livio: Hello sir, may I ask why are you at my house
Me: Certainly! My name is Novmbyr and I work with the AFC (American Farmers Committee). I came here to ask you one simple question, if I may.
Livio: Shoot
Me: What number of cows do you own on your farm sir?
Livio: about 60, why?
Me: Oh no reason, I just wanted to know where your monumental stacks of bullshit came from you limey fuck. have a nice day :)