R Thread Dave Scheidt @DaveScheidt This is why we talk so much s--- about Al "art". Kim Jung Gi left us less than a a week and Al bros are already "replicating" his style and demanding credit. Vultures and spineless, untalented losers. This sets a horrible precedent. 5You @BG_5you - 17h Hi! I just trained a model to draw in the style of the late Kim Jung Gi, as an hommage. I'm fairly happy with the results, given how complicated is his style. Hope you like it, feel free to use it by yourself (credit plz) : drive.google.com/drive/folders/... #KimJungGi #stablediffusion UR

Origin Entry: AI Art

File type: png

Resolution: (598px x 838px)

File size: 301 KB

Petra @petravoice art vs artist 3:40 PM · May 31, 2024 · 1.3M Views

No. 166 April '74 33230 MAID OUR PRICE 40 CHEAP GIVING A.I. THE MIDDLE FINGERS Remember to always pay real artists. They hate drawing hands as much as A.I. does-but unlike A.I., artists count. CONCEPT MATT COHEN ARTIST NORMAN MINGO ORIGINALLY PUBLISHED MAD #16 APR 1974

Cloetta Spelletta @CloettaTheWitch Is this the end of all the endings? 9:58 AM Nov 25, 2024 1.2M Views • ...

View All 332 Images

Load 10 Comments

AI generated comic book loses copyright

Twitter artist explains why they're against AI art, Part 2

← Thread VERTIGRIS @VERTIGRIS_ART What I hate about Al art is not that I fear for my job or that I'm afraid of change. I hate that it is art theft taken to the extreme. Using other people's years of work to feed it into an algorithm so you can generate something similar in a few seconds is just so morally foul. RJ Palmer @arvalis - Aug 13 A new Al image generator appears to be capable of making art that looks 100% human made. As an artist I am extremely concerned. Show this thread 7:09 AM - Aug 14, 2022 2,684 Retweets 53 Quote Tweets 12.7K Likes 27 +] 1

Twitter artist explains why they're against AI art

← Thread Loish ✔ @loishh In light of the protest going on against Al art, I wanted to share my take on this issue NO TO AI GENERATED IMAGES 8:58 AM - Dec 15, 2022 15.8K Retweets 433 Quote Tweets 60 27 Loish ✔ @loishh . Dec 15 Replying to @loishh I wholeheartedly support the ongoing protest against Al art. Why? Because my artwork is in the datasets used to train these image generators without my consent. I get zero compensation for tihs, even though these image generators cost money to use, and are a commercial product. 1,264 ♡ 18.6K 12 1,062 48 116.8K Likes Loish @loishh . Dec 15 Musicians are not being treated the same way. Their words: "Because diffusion models are prone to memorization and overfitting, releasing a model trained on copyrighted data could potentially result in legal issues." Why is the work of visual artists being treated differently? 33 ♡ 13.2K 438 Loish @loishh . Dec 15 Many have compared image generators to human artists seeking out inspiration. Those two are not the same. My art is literally being fed into these generators through the datasets, and spat back out of a program that has no inherent sense of what is respectful to artists. 1,252 ↑ 9,978 ↑ 13.2K ↑ *** ↑ Loish @loishh. Dec 15 Until there is an ethically sourced database that compensates artists for the use of their images, I am against Al art. I also think platforms should do everything they can to prevent scraping of their content for these databases. ↑

Artist does Twitch art stream, gets art copied by AI before it's finished

Tweet FUYA 18 PATREON @fuyafuyu A dude took a screenshot from an artist's art stream on Twitch (right) then threw it on Al and posted it on Twitter (left) while the artist still hasn't finished his work. If this is the new norm, why draw anymore just so your arts become fodder for Al even before they're done? HAJE714_사담계 @Haje714 • Oct 12 트위치에서 한 일러레가 생방송으로 그림방송하던걸 스샷으로 찍어서 노블ai에 이 미지 업로드 후 제너레이션해서 나온 출력물을 자기 계정에 업로드 했다는데 ....진짜고 가짜고를 떠나서 저게 실제로 가능한 상황이라 참담하네. 이제 실시간 그림방송 싹 사라지겠네 2 2 2 22 Show this thread **** CONTACTutom Yanayed my te We maybe a bate 조릿담금 7:31 AM. Oct 12, 2022 팔로잉 탐색 ato1004d 5,105 Retweets 348 Quote Tweets 21.5K Likes 검색

Twitter artist gets their art copied by AI, Part 2

Source is these tweets...
"Tweet #1":https://twitter.com/zuyuancesar/status/1602263936258445313
"Tweet #2":https://twitter.com/zuyuancesar/status/1602263944672219139
"Tweet #3":https://twitter.com/zuyuancesar/status/1602266333756149761
"Tweet #4":https://twitter.com/zuyuancesar/status/1603144187670835200

I think I prefer when G@m3rZ™ talk about videogames more than those guys

Holy Moly, I knew Bob Ross would never say the interopability between 3D assets would be a thing, it was a NFT bro in disguise! NFT SOOS NF AI CO Wait a second, this is a totally new discourse, I feel you're hiding us something! But it's the future, for 3D assets, AI could be the next level of procedural generation! INA Oh my god! It's the same but different! INNA NFT AI ARTIST Devteamlife f The Devteam Life @Devteam L Damn it! twitch.tv/devteaml VL

It's okay to ignore copyright... unless an AI does it

Tim Soret @timsoret உயாளத Artists on Artstation are extremely concerned with copyright, as you can tell by browsing here. It's clearly the core of the problem. MOVING OPPER FROS S M SHALT SO ROUND TWO HORIZON ROUND TWO NOTO GENERATED MAGES NO TO GENERATED IMAGES To the A 21 KINGSCLAIVE TECHS N KINGSELLINE FINAL FANTASY ROUND FOUR ... STOP MIDING N. Z ROUR FOUR

The Next Generation of AI art programs

TNG screenshot comes from "this video":https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1px4qoILmGw.

Pro-AI argument of art not being theft

WHY AI ISN'T COPYING ELI 5 AKA STRAIGHT TO THE POINT SIMPLE EXPLANATION OF DIFFUSION MODELS WE TAKE A PICTURE OF A THING, LET'S SAY A DOG, AND WE TELL TO THE COMPUTER: "HEY COMPUTER, PLEASE GRADUALLY TURN THIS PICTURE INTO NOISE, MEMORIZE EVERY STEP WHILE DOING SO" ORIGINAL PIC ORIGINAL PIC OF COMPLETELY RANDOM NOISE WAIT A MINUITE, IT'S NOT THE SAME DOG! STEP 1 ORIGINAL PIC OF COMPLETELY RANDOM NOISE STEP 4 STEP 2 NOW WE TAKE A PICTURE OF ACTUAL RANDOM NOISE AND WE TELL THE COMPUTER: "HEY COMPUTER, PLEASE PLAY THE 'DOG TO NOISE ALGORITHM' BUT REVERSED" PANE STEP 4 Beep-boop ok, done, I'll save this in my memory as "Dog to Noise Algorithm" STEP 3 STEP 3 Yes, because you started from actual random noise. I've learned how to generate a dog from noise. I'm not copypasting anything STEP 3 STEP 2 SO NOW IF WE TEACH THE COMPUTER ABOUT THE COLOR BLACK, AND WE THEN ASK: "HEY COMPUTER, PLEASE PLAY THE 'COLOR BLACK TO NOISE ALGORITHM' BUT REVERSED, AND THE 'DOG TO NOISE' ALGORITHM BUT REVERSED, AT THE SAME TIME" STEP 2 da STEP 4 "I'm an artist, similarly to how I would get paid to give an art lesson, I should be paid if you train an Al with my artworks" STEP 1 TADAAAN! YOU NOW HAVE A COMPLETELY ORIGINAL BLACK DOG! ADDENDUM FEEL FREE TO CROP AWAY THIS PART IF YOU'RE JUST EXPLAINING THE TECH "Yes but AI does it way faster than a human, we should be protected from it, the competition will become unfair" STEP 1 IF YOU ACTUALLY HAD TO TEACH SOMEBODY, YES, BUT THIS IS LIKE LOOKING AT SOMEONE'S FINISHED WORK AND LEARNING. WE ALL DO IT, THAT'S HOW HUMAN BRAIN WORKS. YOU LOOK AT OTHER PEOPLE'S WORK ALL DAY, AND LEARN FROM THEM FOR FREE, THERE'S NOTHING WRONG WITH THAT. YOU PAY AN ARTIST WHEN THEY ORGANIZE A CLASS, NOT WHEN YOU STUDY THEIR WORK AND LEARN THROUGH OBSERVATION. "If AI doesn't copy, why do I see watermarks and signatures in it?" SLOWING DOWN EVOLUTION BECAUSE IT'S UNPLEASANT TO HAVE TO ADAPT ISN'T SOUND LOGIC. THERE'S AN INCREDIBLE POTENTIAL IN THIS TECH FOR ARTISTS WHO ADOPT IT. THEY WILL BE ABLE TO INCREASE THEIR WORKFLOW BY HUNDREDS OF TIMES, SIMILARLY TO HOW E-COMMERCE PUSHED THE BUSINESS THAT LEARNED TO USE IT. LIFE ITSELF IS ABOUT ADAPTATION. LOOK AT HOW TODAY WE NEED MORE ENGINEERS AND LESS FACTORY WORKERS OR FARMERS. WOULD YOU SAY THAT IT MAKES SENSE TO BAN CINEMA BECAUSE BOOK WRITERS HAD TO DIVERSIFY THEIR SKILLSET BECAUSE OF ITS COMPETITION? "I don't care how the technology works, I've seen an AI generated image that is basically identical to an artist's picture. That's plagiarism!" AI ISN'T SENTIENT NOR INTELLIGENT. IF YOU SHOW IT A PAINTING THAT HAS A SIGNATURE ON IT, AND THEN ASK IT TO GENERATE A PAINTING, AI WILL ASSUME THAT THE WEIRD SCRIBBLE THAT HUMANS PUT ON THEM MUST BE PART OF WHAT WE CALL "A PAINTING" AND PUTS IT IN IT. SAME GOES WITH WATERMARKS. 100% YES. IT DOESN'T MATTER HOW SOMETHING HAS BEEN GENERATED, THROUGH AI OR THROUGH HUMAN HANDS, IF YOU PLAGIARIZE YOU PLAGIARIZE, AND YOU PAY THE LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF IT. SOMETHING INSPIRED BY SOMETHING ELSE IS FINE, BUT IF YOU PROMPT AN AI WORK TO REPRODUCE EXACTLY ANOTHER ARTWORK, AND THEN SELL IT, THAT'S JUST PLAGIARISM AND IT'S THE SAME AS TRYING TO SELL ANY COUNTERFEIT PRODUCT.

+19

AI Art - Less than a week after his death, Kim Jung Gi had his art style copied by an AI

PROTIP: Press the ← and → keys to navigate the gallery, 'g' to view the gallery, or 'r' to view a random image.

View Gallery Random Image

Top Comments

Ryik

Dec 22, 2022 at 02:40PM EST

Using an AI to generate art doesn't make you an artist. You are discerning between art pieces drawn by a machine, making you a curator at best.

Creating an AI to generate art could make you an artist depending on your definition of an artist, the same way rigging up a machine with colored pencils and then making it spin over paper could make you an artist.

Asking people who use your colored pencil spinning machine to credit you because you are proud of your creation isn't a bad thing.

That you made your colored pencil spinning machine mimic the art style of someone else? That's a different matter from all of the above.

+16

AJ_Lethal

Dec 23, 2022 at 12:16AM EST

there's something deeply fucked up on feeding a very recently deceased artist's work to an AI for clout.

+15

+ Add a Comment

Comments (10)

Display Comments

+ Add an Image

Image Details

5,665 views (7 from today)

Uploaded Dec 22, 2022 at 12:06AM EST

Origin Entry

AI Art

Source

Twitter

About the Uploader

AceAttorney9000

Sleuth & Curator & Conversationalist & Media Bus Boy

Textile Embed

!https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/002/500/058/277.png!

Hauu! You must login or signup first!

Less than a week after his death, Kim Jung Gi had his art style copied by an AI

Comments 10 total

More:

AI generated comic book loses copyright

AI “artists” be like

Twitter artist explains why they're against AI art, Part 2

Twitter artist explains why they're against AI art

Artist does Twitch art stream, gets art copied by AI before it's finished

Twitter artist gets their art copied by AI, Part 2

I think I prefer when G@m3rZ™ talk about videogames more than those guys

reject anthropocentrism

Its over

It's okay to ignore copyright... unless an AI does it

The Next Generation of AI art programs

Pro-AI argument of art not being theft

AI Art - Less than a week after his death, Kim Jung Gi had his art style copied by an AI

Top Comments

Ryik

AJ_Lethal

Comments (10)

Add a Comment

Image Details

Origin Entry

Source

Tags

About the Uploader

AceAttorney9000

Textile Embed

Today's Top Image Galleries

Elon Musk Heil Salute

Casual Mai Shiranui

Merrivius Elf and Human Comics

Ideal GF

Hauu! You must login or signup first!

Already a memeber?

Don't have an account?

Also Trending:

Less than a week after his death, Kim Jung Gi had his art style copied by an AI

Comments 10 total

More:

Moar:

Top Comments

Comments (10)

Add a Comment

Image Details

Origin Entry

Source

Tags

About the Uploader

Textile Embed

Today's Top Image Galleries