2
Incel Tech example image depicting joe biden's face run through incel.tech website.

Incel Tech

Part of a series on Involuntary Celibacy / Incel. [View Related Entries]

PROTIP: Press 'i' to view the image gallery, 'v' to view the video gallery, or 'r' to view a random entry.

This submission is currently being researched & evaluated!

You can help confirm this entry by contributing facts, media, and other evidence of notability and mutation.

About

Incel Tech or Incel.tech is a website on which users can upload an image of anyone's face and receive a face structure analysis on a variety of facial features, including canthal tilt, mouth-to-nose ratio and more, to determine whether or not the facial features meet the ideal measurements of attractiveness using physiognomy as discussed in looksmaxxing and incel communities. The site was launched on April 2nd, 2024, by vers and Lukas Podcast and was funded by the cryptocurrency Incel Coin.

History

On April 2nd, 2024, X[1] / Twitter user and podcast host @versandlukas, aka vers and Lukas Podcast, made a post announcing the launch of incel.tech,[2] a website that allows users to upload photographs of anyone's face, regardless of gender, for a facial structure analysis. The analysis returns the photo with an analysis of 11 unique facial ratios and measurements to determine ideal attractiveness as discussed in incel and looksmaxxing communities, listing the ideal measurements for each measured section next to the actual measurements and grading them. In the post, @versandlukas provides an example where he ran a photo of Joe Biden through the application (shown below).


Feature Midface ratio Rating Measurement Ideal noticeably compact midface 1.11 1 to 1.05 Facial width to height ratio perfect 2.39 more than 2 Chin to philtrum ratio Canthal tilt extremely short philtrum slightly too downwards eyes 2.76 2 to 2.25 left 5°, right 3° more than 4 Mouth to nose ratio Bigonial width Lip ratio Eye separation ratio significantly too wide mouth noticeably narrow jaw extremely uneven lips slightly too close together eyes 1.75 1.5 to 1.62 1.21 1.1 to 1.15 4.22 1.55 to 1.65 0.45 0.45 to 0.49 Eye to mouth angle significantly too wide apart 54° 4 45° to 49° eyes Lower third height perfect 1.51 more than 1.25 Palpebral fissure length perfect left 4.98, right 5.74 more than 3.5
Introducing the latest advancement in incel technology. Upload a picture and get a complete face structure analysis, try and share your result, the tool runs on your browser privately offline. This project was funded by INCEL COIN, contract address: GACL2mEL9BR4baJBbYWfNKa5mxBYXRdU4ZthedKcVkx1. Thank you INCEL COIN.

Features

According to vers and Lukas Podcast, the tool runs in your browser "privately" and "offline," implying it does not take any data from users who might upload their own photos to the tool. Vers and Lukas podcast also insists the tool works on men and women, as well as animals.[3][4]

Incel.tech analyzes the following 11 facial features: Midface ratio, facial width to height ratio, chin to philtrum ratio, canthal tilt, mouth to nose ratio, bigonial width, lip ratio, eye separation ratio, eye to mouth angle, lower third height, palpebral fissure length.

Online Presence

Following the release of the tool, X / Twitter users began sharing the results of running various photographs through it. On April 2nd, 2024, X[5] user @VERYCOOLLUKEY posted the results of running Sydney Sweeney's face through the tool, writing, "Sydney Sweeney just got proven scientifically mid," garnering over 700 likes in under a day (shown below, left).

On the same day, X[6] user and content creator Justin Whang posted his results, writing, "The only one of these I’ve heard of is canthal tilt, so I’m satisfied," garnering over 600 likes in under a day (shown below, right).


red by $INCEL COIN) Feature Rating Measurement Ideal Midface ratio horribly compact 1.17 1 to 1.05 midface Facial perfect 2.55 more width to than height 2 ratio Chin to philtrum extremely short 2.73 2 to 2.25 ratio philtrum Canthal tilt perfect left 7%, right 7 more than 4 Mouth to slightly too 1.63 1.5 nose ratio wide mouth to 18 1.62 Bigonial horribly 1.28 1.1 to width narrow jaw 1.15 Lip ratio extremely 3.2 1.55 uneven lips to 1.65 Eye separation ratio slightly too 0.43 close together eyes 0.45 to 0.49 Eye to mouth significantly 55° too wide 45° to angle apart eyes 49° Lower perfect 1.32 more third height than 1.25 Palpebral slightly too fissure exposed left 3.26, right more 3.54 than length eyes 3.5 Feature Rating Measurement Ideal Midface ratio noticeably long 0.97 1 to 1.05 midface Facial width to perfect 2.1 height ratio more than 2 Chin to philtrum ratio slightly too short philtrum 2.27 2 to 2.25 Canthal tilt perfect left 7°, right 7° more than 4 Mouth to nose ratio slightly too narrow mouth 1.47 1.5 to 1.62 Bigonial width significantly too narrow jaw 1.24 1.1 to 1.15 Lip ratio noticeably uneven lips 1.41 1.55 to 1.65 Eye separation ratio slightly too close together eyes 0.44 0.45 to 0.49 Eye to mouth angle perfect 47° 45° to 49° Lower third height noticeably short lower third 1.19 more than 1.25 Palpebral fissure .. length slightly too exposed eyes left 3.04, right more 3.17 than 3.5

Various Examples


3:23 ฟล Eye to perfect 45° 45° mouth to 49° angle Lower perfect 1.41 more third than height 1.25 Palpebral perfect left 3.76, right more fissure 3.27 than length 3.5 incel.tech Feature Midface ratio Facial width to height ratio Chin to philtrum ratio Rating extremely compact midface perfect Canthal tilt Mouth to nose ratio significantly too long philtrum perfect noticeably narrow mouth Bigonial width horribly narrow jaw Lip ratio perfect Eye separation ratio perfect Eye to mouth angle horribly wide apart eyes Lower third height Palpebral fissure length extremely short lower third significantly too exposed eyes

Search Interest

External References

[1] X – versandlukas

[2] incel.tech – homepage

[3] X – versandlukas

[4] X – versandlukas

[5] X – VERYCOOLLUKEY

[6] X – justinwhang

Related Entries 13 total


View All Related Entries

Recent Videos

There are no videos currently available.

Recent Images 8 total


Top Comments

| || || |_
Delete
Sensitive
| || || |_

in reply to Cordelius

The only "pushing against the idea of artificial beauty standards" that actually went mainstream was the fat acceptance movement, and only for women. For everyone other than fat women, the standards only got tighter due to the rise of dating apps and instagram/tiktok.

+16
Reply

+ Add a Comment

Comments (17)


Display Comments

Add a Comment


Yo Yo! You must login or signup first!