Penny wrote:
Let me be honest there, as much as I love the Lovecraftian monsters, I don't want to see any Grimms based on them for one reason: Boring.
I just simply find the Lovecraftian monsters boring, sure scary, to a 5 years old, I mean I'm more scared of a bill than Cthulhu. And let's be reasonable there. A giant tentacled, spiky bullshit is just as good as a big freakin' target, the reason why I don't like either Attack on Titan nor The Walking Dead cause I find the enemies too easily evadable (of course apparently the people in both AoT and TWD can't avoid them but that's another story), big and/or clumsy, slow enemies? Ruby would cut them down while standing still. Grimms are perfect they are fast, strong and the reason why they look like common animals with a twist? Well cause the tentacled mouth is useless on the dry land, I mean if it wouldn't be then Mother Nature would gave us tentacled mouth not what we have now, right? I always say there's a good darn reason why we look like how we do now, and so does everything else, and I say Grimms also follow this rule, the so called Survival of the Fittest. Current Grimms proven to be the most effective against humans, so when the Grimms started to spread across the planet these types became common cause they were the best at what they are doing.Anyway another topic I was just thinking and I think I found out Team RWBY's spirit Grimms, or at least most of them.
Ruby: Ruby alludes to the Little Red Riding hood, right? So obviously the Grimm we can associate with her are the Beowulfs.
Weiss: Weiss alludes to the Snow White, as for her Grimm are the Boarbatusks. The reason behind this is the fact in the original Snow White story, I mean well not the original original, but the more kid friendly version, the Hunter killed a wild boar and took it's heart to the evil Queen, saying that's Snow White's.
Blake: Well now, poor Blake, I didn't find a matching Grimm, yet. As cause Blake alludes to well, probably Belle from the Beauty and the Beast, but let's be honest I have my doubts though, still we didn't see a bull like Grimm yet.
Yang: Yang alludes to Goldilocks, her Grimm are Ursas. This's the easiest honestly.
I disagree. We should definitely see Lovecraftian Grimm. My reasons: The Grimm are already pretty eldritch. They may look and possibly act like animals, but they don't need to eat, drink or shit, they can live for who-knows how long, they can sense negativity, they have no organs or even bleed, again they are already pretty eldritch.
And we have seen progressively less "normal" Grimm, like the Griffons, the Dragon, and the Creeps. And it's reasonable to assume that further away from the Kingdoms, the Grimm would be less and less like shadow animals and more like monsters, if not even alien. So, it would fit perfectly, if we saw a lovecraftian Grimm.
With your other points, I disagree as well. For starters, "big" doesn't mean Slow or even Clumsy (go play God Eaters if you don't believe me, freaking Ouroboros already proves what I mean).
Second, regardless of size they can make up for any speed weakness by being freaking tough. Hell, the titans from AOT, at least the most basic ones, had a ridiculously specific weak point, which was the only way to really damage them. Or for a more well-known example: Godzilla.
Third, "tentacled mouth is useless in dry land, I mean if it wouldn’t be then Mother Nature would gave us tentacled mouth not what we have now, right?" <-This is just dumb. Evolution makes things develop what they need or improve what they have to survive. We didn't need tentacled mouths because our "normal" mouths already were all we needed. Heck, we got no tentacles, feathers, beaks, paws or anything like that because we didn't need them to survive, what we have is already more than we need to survive.
Fourth, The whole "survival of the fittest" part applying to the Grimm is dumb as well. The more "normal, animal-like" Grimm are the ones closest to the cities, thus the ones that die the most. The less normal Grimm are further away, and are much stronger. We got in-show evidence of this, especially with the Dragon. So if they followed that "rule", the current Grimm would all not be like simple painted animals, they would at the least look like fantasy creatures.
Fith, who says a Chulthu Grimm would be on land? It could be on water. It would be boring if there were no aquatic Grimm. It could also be on sand, it wouldn't be the first time a tentacle monster lurking under sand was done.
As for associating Grimm with Team RWBY, let's consider the Beast regarding Blake. The Beast was a monster, with traits of different animals. So if there was a Grimm we could associate with Blake, like the Beowulves with Ruby and Ursa with Yang, it would not be one of the puny, animal Grimm mooks, it would be a stronger, more fantastical Grimm.