Sup! You must login or signup first!

This entry contains content that may be considered sensitive to some viewers.
Imadethatspongebobentrysomyentryisinvalid

Confirmed   89,444

About

Bidoof's Law is an internet axiom that commonly states that if a user reposts or creates any form of porn, their argument is invalid. Online, the "law" has been criticized as a fallacious ad hominem attack where the user is criticized for posting pornography online rather than being criticized for the argument itself.

Origin

On April 20th, 2017, Tumblr user bidoof[1] posted the following:

will there ever be anything more timelessly funnier on this site than seeing some joyless idiot asserting their stupid controversial worldviews internet toughguy style and then checking their blog and they're just, completely openly and shamelessly addicted to hentai

"will there ever be anything more timelessly funnier on this site than seeing some joyless idiot asserting their stupid controversial worldviews internet toughguy style and then checking their blog and they’re just, completely openly and shamelessly addicted to hentai"

As of April 9th, 2020, the post has over 79,000 notes.

Spread

In the years following the post, the law was often brought up on Twitter and Tumblr, to criticize users for entering into internet arguments when they also post porn. A screencap of the original post was reposted to /r/tumblr[2] by Reddit user Ignativsss, on, March 23rd, 2020, gaining over 1160 upvotes as of April 9th, 2020. On October 20th, 2019, Twitter user @replicantremake[3] brought up the law in response to another user's argument, gaining over 1,700 retweets and 5,200 likes as of April 9th, 2020.

puzzle games.com inc" est.1868 send to edelgard @replicantremake Good ol bidoofs law rSociety Haöshoku, @Supe. 22h Replying to @SuperShoku UK news Chick-fil-A to close its first UK location following backlash from LGBTQ A pronoun got upset at this, of course they wouldn't get the point on why this is bad, regardless if I wanted their food or not. Then again, rich white kids with too rights group much time on their hands wouldn't know what it's like to lose a job The American fast-food company opened its first restaurant in Reading on October 10. Readina Pride then issued a statement マッパニナッタ @mappaninatta· 1h 「は、はずかしいから.早くして」 bidoof will there ever be anything more timeles funnier on this site than seeing some jo idiot asserting their stupid controversia worldviews internet toughguy style and checking their blog and they're just, co openly and shamelessly addicted to he 12:20 PM · Oct 20, 2019 · Twitter for Andru 1.7K Retweets 5.2K Likes

Criticism

Online, the law has seen heavy criticism from internet communities, as it constitutes an argumentum ad hominem attack, which is "any attempt to link the validity of a premise to a characteristic or belief of the person advocating the premise." It has been compared to other ad hominem attacks such as having ''pronouns in bio'' or using an anime avatar. Parodies and mockeries of the original law were also created. Examples include a post by llamanatee[5] in /r/coaxedintoasnafu (shown below, left) and Tumblr user vaporwavevocap[6] (shown below, right).

pokemon ur horny lol i win argument
Ditto's Law: When someone harshly judges or dehumanizes someone for enjoying hentai or p---, they inevitably have a secřet p--- addiction fof things wáy worse than the things they are judging the other person for.

Users online have also defended the law. @StebMcDreb[4] on Twitter clarified the law was referring to the contrast between the viewpoints of the user's argument and the content that they post on their account (shown below).

I Lady Alexis @StebMcDreb bidoof's law doesn't mean "your politics are invalid if you RT p---" it's specifically about the contrast of joyless chuds going on about degeneracy and the decline of art and western civilization and then the first thing on their page is "my sister's armpits smell good!?!?!?" 12:43 PM - Oct 22, 2019 · Twitter Web Client 3.9K Retweets 12.8K Likes I Lady Alexis @StebMcDreb · Oct 22, 2019 Replying to @StebMcDreb for leftists, who typically subscribe more to supporting and uplifting sex workers and independent (mostly nsfw) queer creators, being horny on main is entirely consistent ♡ 20 27 211 2.1K | Lady Alexis if these are the tweets that push me over to 1700I swear to f------ god @StebMcDreb · Oct 22, 2019 8. 439

Search Interest

External References

[1] Tumblr – bidoof

[2] Reddit – Ignativsss

[3] Twitter [NSFW WARNING]@replicantremake

[4] Twitter – @StebMcDreb

[5] Reddit – /r/coaxedintoasnafu

[6] Tumblr – vaporwavevocap



Share Pin

Recent Images 7 total


Recent Videos 0 total

There are no recent videos.




Load 63 Comments
Heh i was almost forced to come up with a counter- argument but i see here that you retweet porn hahaha tough luck pal

Bidoof's Law

PROTIP: Press 'i' to view the image gallery, 'v' to view the video gallery, or 'r' to view a random entry.

This entry contains content that may be considered sensitive to some viewers.

About

Bidoof's Law is an internet axiom that commonly states that if a user reposts or creates any form of porn, their argument is invalid. Online, the "law" has been criticized as a fallacious ad hominem attack where the user is criticized for posting pornography online rather than being criticized for the argument itself.

Origin

On April 20th, 2017, Tumblr user bidoof[1] posted the following:


will there ever be anything more timelessly funnier on this site than seeing some joyless idiot asserting their stupid controversial worldviews internet toughguy style and then checking their blog and they're just, completely openly and shamelessly addicted to hentai

"will there ever be anything more timelessly funnier on this site than seeing some joyless idiot asserting their stupid controversial worldviews internet toughguy style and then checking their blog and they’re just, completely openly and shamelessly addicted to hentai"

As of April 9th, 2020, the post has over 79,000 notes.

Spread

In the years following the post, the law was often brought up on Twitter and Tumblr, to criticize users for entering into internet arguments when they also post porn. A screencap of the original post was reposted to /r/tumblr[2] by Reddit user Ignativsss, on, March 23rd, 2020, gaining over 1160 upvotes as of April 9th, 2020. On October 20th, 2019, Twitter user @replicantremake[3] brought up the law in response to another user's argument, gaining over 1,700 retweets and 5,200 likes as of April 9th, 2020.


puzzle games.com inc" est.1868 send to edelgard @replicantremake Good ol bidoofs law rSociety Haöshoku, @Supe. 22h Replying to @SuperShoku UK news Chick-fil-A to close its first UK location following backlash from LGBTQ A pronoun got upset at this, of course they wouldn't get the point on why this is bad, regardless if I wanted their food or not. Then again, rich white kids with too rights group much time on their hands wouldn't know what it's like to lose a job The American fast-food company opened its first restaurant in Reading on October 10. Readina Pride then issued a statement マッパニナッタ @mappaninatta· 1h 「は、はずかしいから.早くして」 bidoof will there ever be anything more timeles funnier on this site than seeing some jo idiot asserting their stupid controversia worldviews internet toughguy style and checking their blog and they're just, co openly and shamelessly addicted to he 12:20 PM · Oct 20, 2019 · Twitter for Andru 1.7K Retweets 5.2K Likes

Criticism

Online, the law has seen heavy criticism from internet communities, as it constitutes an argumentum ad hominem attack, which is "any attempt to link the validity of a premise to a characteristic or belief of the person advocating the premise." It has been compared to other ad hominem attacks such as having ''pronouns in bio'' or using an anime avatar. Parodies and mockeries of the original law were also created. Examples include a post by llamanatee[5] in /r/coaxedintoasnafu (shown below, left) and Tumblr user vaporwavevocap[6] (shown below, right).


pokemon ur horny lol i win argument Ditto's Law: When someone harshly judges or dehumanizes someone for enjoying hentai or p---, they inevitably have a secřet p--- addiction fof things wáy worse than the things they are judging the other person for.

Users online have also defended the law. @StebMcDreb[4] on Twitter clarified the law was referring to the contrast between the viewpoints of the user's argument and the content that they post on their account (shown below).


I Lady Alexis @StebMcDreb bidoof's law doesn't mean "your politics are invalid if you RT p---" it's specifically about the contrast of joyless chuds going on about degeneracy and the decline of art and western civilization and then the first thing on their page is "my sister's armpits smell good!?!?!?" 12:43 PM - Oct 22, 2019 · Twitter Web Client 3.9K Retweets 12.8K Likes I Lady Alexis @StebMcDreb · Oct 22, 2019 Replying to @StebMcDreb for leftists, who typically subscribe more to supporting and uplifting sex workers and independent (mostly nsfw) queer creators, being horny on main is entirely consistent ♡ 20 27 211 2.1K | Lady Alexis if these are the tweets that push me over to 1700I swear to f------ god @StebMcDreb · Oct 22, 2019 8. 439

Search Interest

External References

[1] Tumblr – bidoof

[2] Reddit – Ignativsss

[3] Twitter [NSFW WARNING]@replicantremake

[4] Twitter – @StebMcDreb

[5] Reddit – /r/coaxedintoasnafu

[6] Tumblr – vaporwavevocap

Recent Videos

There are no videos currently available.

Recent Images 7 total


+ Add a Comment

Comments (63)


Display Comments

Add a Comment